While working with CDI I have always wondered why the CDI JSR does not take over the responsibility of JSR 330 by merging it into the CDI specification.
Do you think the CDI JSR should merge JSR 330 into the CDI specification?
Leave your comments!
Posted March 13, 2016
Reza Rahman - I fully agree with you. I don't think there was ever much value that came out of JSR 330, just more complications like redundant annotations. It makes even less sense now that CDI is set to support Java SE and is far more modular (March 17, 2016)
Manfred Riem - I have emailed the current CDI expert group about it, but at the moment I think there is not a lot of traction within the expert group to do something about it (March 27, 2016)